August 18, 2004


Content needs context.
Category: Communication

Today I will be a 56-year-old divorced woman. Tomorrow I will be a drunken college girl. I’m fat? Nah…I’m skinny? Whence come my thoughts? What is my internet identity today? Will they respect my words if they come from a doctor? I could just be anonymous.

Steve, are you going anywhere with this? Yes. If I’m going to read what you’ve written, I’m going to need to know a little information about you.

There should be a rule that all bloggers need to post:

  • a picture of themselves
  • information about themselves (e.g. age, sex, education level, etc.)


    Like it or not experiences need to be taken within the context of one’s life. It’s all fine and dandy for people to pretend ‘words are words’ and ‘thoughts are thoughts.’ However, it’s just not true. Your thoughts are your perceptions of events and are colored by your life. To rob the reader of context does both you and the reader a serious disservice.

    People seem to have this unnatural fear that their words won’t be taken seriously if they reveal their non-internet identity. Perhaps that’s partially true. Perhaps there are some people that will listen to you simply because they don’t know that you’re just a freshman in college. On the other hand, you’re giving up on the people who will take your words to heart because a person wrote it.

    Is it a privacy issue? Personally, I don’t understand the people who publish their personal thoughts and want privacy. Why bother? There is already great technology for this. It’s called a journal. “But I want others to benefit from my experiences…” Well… they’re going to need to context to really benefit.

    OK – I fully admit that I just had a random entry. I didn’t take the time to organize my thoughts. For you lucky RSS readers out there this could mean that this entry keeps showing up as it gets edited/added to/etc. Oh well… that’s the price you have to pay for not coming to my pretty site.

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 12:39 PM | Comments (4) | TrackBack
  • August 11, 2004


    Two entries too alike...
    Category: Communication

    It has been pointed out that my previous entry was too much like this entry:

    http://www.theevilempire.com/musings/archives/000229.php

    I can't help it that, at times, the same damn things annoy me. I can't tell you the number of times I've come close to reposting this:

    http://www.theevilempire.com/musings/archives/000181.php

    Oh well... You're just going to have to deal with it. ;)

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 04:47 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

    Pet Peeves
    Category: Communication

    I'm curious. What is your biggest grammar pet peeve? Lately I’ve been less and less able to tolerate people screwing up “fewer vs. less.”

    For instance:

    Now with less ads.
    Now with less carbs.

    I know that I have a bit of the old OCD. As such I’m more likely to be bothered by the butchery. So today I ask the question – what drives you nuts?

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 08:36 AM | Comments (10) | TrackBack
    July 26, 2004


    The murder and the parliament...
    Category: Communication

    I love it when I come across a good find. Here's today's find for my fellow language geeks:

    Everyone knows that it's a gaggle of geese, but did you know that it was a peep of chickens? You probably knew that it was a murder of crows, but did you know that it was a parliament of owls? Here's a handy guide for the next time you're at a loss when you see a big group of storks. Memorize the list and you too can say, "Hey -- look at that mustering of storks!"

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 06:57 PM | Comments (6) | TrackBack
    July 02, 2004


    War of the Words
    Category: Communication

    Many times in life it’s the squeaky wheel that gets the grease. I suppose I shouldn’t be shocked when the same is true in the wonderful world of words. Everywhere you look these days words are engaged in old-fashioned sibling rivalry, and, much like life, the problem child is getting all the attention.

    Don’t believe me? When was the last time that you were at a party and said, “My, my, you look quite kempt.” Chances are you haven’t. That’s because his brother, Unkempt, locked Kempt in the closet. Kempt sits there forgotten, lost in a sea of Unkempt’s haphazardly strewn clothes.

    I can’t remember the last time I actually got to talk with Figured. Her bitter sister, Disfigured, is always yapping away, “This scar across my face happened from the accident. This gash was …..blah blah blah” Hap sits in the corner alone as his brother spills red wine on the carpet. The rest of the party tries not to stare as Misshapen waddles around the room. Avow couldn’t even come to the party because his brother sold him down the river.

    Am I being ingenuous in my argument? Who knows? Heck, I don’t know if Ingenuous is still alive. Perhaps he was killed by his slimy brother.

    I feel the pain of the overshadowed words. So, as of today, I will now be giving equal time to the good children. Reward the good words for behaving themselves. They deserve it!

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 02:29 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
    April 10, 2004


    Grammar God
    Category: Communication

    Grammar God!
    You are a GRAMMAR GOD!


    If your mission in life is not already to
    preserve the English tongue, it should be.
    Congratulations and thank you!


    How grammatically sound are you?
    brought to you by Quizilla

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 07:56 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack
    February 17, 2004


    For the word geeks at heart.
    Category: Communication

    I constructed the following paragraph as an English quiz:


    Last night I dreamt that I was a bookkeeper. Technically, I was a librarian, but I did keep books there. I lived in a library filled to the rafters with books made of silver. It was a Rousseauian Utopia that far exceeded my previous dreams. Wait; that’s wrong. I think that Moore might be the Utopian guy. I suppose that doesn’t really matter. I was being facetious. My idea of Utopia doesn't come with books. Books are just another form of power. Books are a way that people try to own thoughts. If it were up to me, I would make all books uncopyrightable!


    Many of the words in the paragraph are interesting to a language geek like me. The question is “Which ones are interesting and why?”

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 11:53 AM | Comments (9) | TrackBack
    December 10, 2003


    Too easy to give this away
    Category: Communication

    Today's quiz:

    What do all the following words have in common?

    cleave
    trim
    fast
    buckle
    fix

    (For the benefit of others, don't post the answer. You'll know if you're correct. If you need more or want to verify, drop me a line.)

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 01:55 PM | Comments (3) | TrackBack
    July 29, 2003


    Too many lesses!
    Category: Communication

    Newscasters really need to learn that there is a difference between less and fewer. On several occasions I have heard reporters say the phrase:

    "There are less victims than originally reported."

    Did the victims go on a diet? Did the victims turn out to be skinnier than first thought?

    I remember being 6 (maybe 7) when the teacher said, "There is less sand. There are fewer grains of sand." Should we send these people back to elementary school?

    Oh yeah; I'm gonna scream the next time that I hear, "Join Suzy and I at 6 for the news."

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 10:26 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
    July 17, 2003


    Too much (many) punctuation (marks).?
    Category: Communication

    Computer programming has apparently ruined my once delicate use of parentheses. I now have no problems using parentheses. Even worse, I don't blink twice about using nested parentheses (you know the kind (the ones like this)).

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 12:17 PM | Comments (1) | TrackBack
    April 01, 2003


    Simple rule:
    Category: Communication

    Simple rule:

    'I's' is never right. Unlike 'me' vs. 'I', you are never correct if you say 'I's'. This is true for the possessive (e.g. "It's Kim and I's place."). It is also true for the contraction of is (e.g. "I's educated."). The only time that 'I's' could be right is with the following sentence: "I's ztupid."

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 12:51 PM | Comments (2)

    Scripts
    Category: Communication

    I am a big TV watcher. For the most part I find television very calming. However, lately I have been "Full Of Rage" when watching TV. What is bothering me now? It is the grammar that is used by the characters.

    It is bad enough that my local Starbucks barista doesn't know the difference between 'me' and 'I'; now I have to watch TV shows where lawyers, doctors, and teachers are constantly making mistakes.

    There is NO excuse for this. This is not a real-time decision. These are scripts! These scripts are written by authors who write the dialog for lawyers. They are then edited by other authors. After that, an actor reads and memorizes the lines. If the writers and the editors don't catch the mistake, the actor surely has to think, "hmmm. I'm playing a Harvard-educated lawyer. He would probably know a sixth-grade grammar rule."

    After the writers, the editors, and the actors have missed the mistake, the scene is then performed in front of the director. Surely he will catch the mistake. Apparently he won't.

    This leads me to believe that one of two things is happening. Either a) writers, editors, actors, and directors all can miss a rule I was taught in my pre-teens or b) someone has decided that these characters' speech would be more authentic with the mistakes. Personally, I don't know which is worse!

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 10:28 AM | Comments (3)
    March 31, 2003


    They're against us.
    Category: Communication

    If you've read my previous entries, you probably know that one of my pet peeves is the erosion of the English language.

    It's getting worse. Corporate America has joined the forces of evil. While I was standing in the supermarket line, I noticed that candy makers have determined that the 'S' and the 'Z' are interchangeable. If you doubt this, listen to just a few of my impulse-purchase choices: Koolerz, Mintz, and Squintz.

    It's gotten to the point where we are trying to convince kids that being uneducated is kool. Personally, I think that the whole concept is Ztupid.

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 01:04 PM
    March 17, 2003


    IM tone
    Category: Communication

    Much has been said about losing tone in e-mail. However, lately I have been bothered by IM (instant message). A friend of mine has a slightly different set of stock IM phrases. For example, I say, "BRB." He might say, "AFK." This is understandable. People use different words in conversation. Why shouldn't this happen in IM?

    The problem is that for mild laughter (not quite "lol" but amusing nonetheless) I use "hehe" and he uses "heh." I don't know why the lack of an E bothers me, but it seems to. Every time that he uses this I envision him muttering a forced "heh." You know the kind. Someone tells a joke. You don't think that it is really funny. However, you want that person to understand that you knew that it was at least supposed to be funny. Out comes the "Heh."

    I know what you are thinking; "Maybe you're just not funny." This is very possible. However, he uses this in his own weblogs. Which leads me to believe that either a) he doesn't think that he is funny or b) his "heh" is my "hehe." I have to believe that it is the latter.

    Does this sort of thing happen to anyone else?

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 12:29 PM
    March 12, 2003


    A letter rewrite
    Category: Communication

    I found myself in an awkward position the other day. I was writing a letter to someone and wrote something like "The company sent her and me to the conference." I paused and shook my head. I knew that I would have to change the sentence. This made me so sad. I had to change a sentence that was grammatically correct because it would sound wrong to 90 percent of the world. This lead me to think that if I said this in:

  • the forties, I would have sounded right.

  • the fifties, I would have sounded pretentious but right.

  • the sixties and seventies I would have sounded affected and pretentious but right.

  • this, the new millennium, I would sound UNeducated
  • *sigh*

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 12:26 PM | Comments (1)
    March 11, 2003


    More please
    Category: Communication

    "There is no emoticon for how I am feeling right now"

    - comic book guy in the Simpsons

    Lately I have been feeling very confined by the limited set of emoticons in MSFT Messenger. I also hate the "sticking your tongue out" emoticon. He just looks too goofy. Why can't MSFT give us the ability to import sets of emoticons? Wouldn't that be great? I could finally have that "cower in fear" emoticon that I have always wanted. We could all share sets. There would be a button to send sets of emoticons. You could choose to use the other person's set or yours. We could define our own. Ahhh. What a world it would be. < wistful hoping (like I am thinking of Kristen Kreuk) emoticon / >

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 03:14 PM
    February 27, 2003


    The right way
    Category: Communication

    I'm not saying that I am picky or anal. There are many different ways to skin a cat. That's fine, but to paraphrase Henry Ford, "You can do it anyway you want, as long as it's my way."

    Here are some examples:

  • Toilet paper should be draped OVER the roll.
  • It's pronouced: eSpresso NOT eXpresso, feBREWary Not febUary, NuCLEEer not NuCUlar

  • There should be two (not one) spaces after a period seperating two sentences.

  • Transpired does NOT mean occurred. Livid is a color NOT an emotion
  • Posted by Stephen Speicher at 10:27 AM | Comments (4)
    February 26, 2003


    Squished
    Category: Communication

    I have decided that I really like the word 'insofar.' There is something about it being three words squished together that I find very amusing.

    It's sort of like the Neopolitan ice cream sandwich of words!

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 08:34 AM | Comments (1)
    February 24, 2003


    Vocabulary test
    Category: Communication

    Road to Perdition

    My wife and I have an ongoing debate. I maintain that this movie failed, in part, because people don't know/don't like the word "perdition." She just doesn't understand that people are stupid.

    Do your own poll. Let me know if people know what perdition means.

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 10:30 AM

    Simple test
    Category: Communication

    I am so sick of people mixing up me and I (e.g. He gave the book to John and I). It really isn't that hard. Use this trick -- take the other person out; say it out loud and see if you sound like a complete idiot. If you do, switch it.

    Examples:

  • "Give the book to John and I" becomes "Give the book to I."

  • "John and me went to the store" becomes "Me went to the store."
  • I can't help you if you think that "Me went to the store" sounds right.

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 09:53 AM | Comments (2)
    February 23, 2003


    Words have meanings
    Category: Communication

    nauseous = Causing nausea; sickening
    nauseated = To experience a feeling of sickness in the stomach characterized by an urge to vomit

    Please get it straight!

    Posted by Stephen Speicher at 12:31 PM | Comments (0)